On śro, 2017-03-29 at 16:01 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I'd like to bring the problem of ambiguity of 'UPSTREAM' resolution
> > on our Bugzilla to the discussion.
> > While the resolution generically indicates an issue upstream, it is
> > used differently by different developers, and sometimes even in a
> > few meanings by a single developer. What's even worse, it is both
> > used as a positive, neutral and negative resolution which renders it
> > kinda meaningless as a classification criteria.
> > [...]
> > How would you feel about removing/disabling the UPSTREAM resolution,
> > and expecting developers to use UPSTREAM keyword + regular
> > resolution?
> > Any other ideas?
> 
> Use it in the sense as it is defined in Bugzilla?
> 
> UPSTREAM
>     The requested bug is considered to be out of the purview of the
>     distro and should be submitted/discussed directly with the
>     respective upstream project. This could include a number of things
>     such as changing default configuration options or behavior, adding
>     new options or functionality, or deleting support for older
>     systems.
> 
> IMHO it would be out of proportion to remove the field, just because
> some developers don't use it as intended.

What is your plan on making the developers use it correctly?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny