From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-08-14
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 21:51:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1470685915.21222.4.camel@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52993bd4-afc9-197e-acda-96db413e6608@gentoo.org>
El lun, 08-08-2016 a las 14:35 +0200, Marek Szuba escribió:
> [...]
I am not sure if this has been already suggested or not (as I have not
being able to follow all the thread :S)
My suggestion, for now would be to modify a bit the current policy: if
I don't misremember, we can drop stable keywords for arches that are
not stabilizing the package in 90 days. The problem is that it
currently cannot be done in most of the times because it's not feasible
for the maintainer to drop the keyword and *also* all the stable
keywords of reverse deps.
Hence, I would suggest to, apart of allowing the maintainers to drop
the keywords, to also allow them to stabilize that packages on that
arches when this timeout has expired
Thanks a lot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-08 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 14:15 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2016-08-14 Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-04 16:24 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-04 17:08 ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2016-08-04 17:09 ` Brian Dolbec
2016-08-04 18:31 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-04 20:12 ` Andrew Savchenko
2016-08-04 22:22 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-04 23:25 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-05 2:26 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-05 10:57 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-05 14:28 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-05 14:36 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-05 15:36 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-08 12:35 ` Marek Szuba
2016-08-08 19:51 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2016-08-09 2:07 ` Jack Morgan
2016-08-09 5:32 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-09 5:59 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-09 10:05 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-09 14:41 ` Brian Dolbec
2016-08-09 15:12 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-09 16:15 ` Brian Dolbec
2016-08-09 17:09 ` Kent Fredric
2016-08-09 17:12 ` Brian Evans
2016-08-09 17:18 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2016-08-09 17:22 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2016-08-09 20:08 ` Rich Freeman
2016-08-09 20:14 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-09 20:20 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-10 1:15 ` Pallav Agarwal
2016-08-10 1:28 ` Brian Dolbec
2016-08-05 17:32 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-05 17:29 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-04 21:30 ` Daniel Campbell
2016-08-05 16:11 ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-08-05 16:22 ` [gentoo-project] " Michael Palimaka
2016-08-05 17:06 ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-08-05 17:11 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2016-08-05 17:38 ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-08-05 17:19 ` Michał Górny
2016-08-05 17:21 ` Michael Orlitzky
2016-08-05 17:31 ` [gentoo-project] " Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-05 18:42 ` William Hubbs
2016-08-05 18:45 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
2016-08-05 18:55 ` NP-Hardass
2016-08-05 19:03 ` Kristian Fiskerstrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1470685915.21222.4.camel@gentoo.org \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox