From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-4037-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534F8138825
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed,  5 Nov 2014 10:49:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E95F5E0907;
	Wed,  5 Nov 2014 10:49:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6594DE08E2
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  5 Nov 2014 10:49:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.35] (88.Red-81-36-183.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [81.36.183.88])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60A2F3402A2
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed,  5 Nov 2014 10:49:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1415184549.15134.9.camel@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Re: Call for Council
 Agenda Items - 11-Nov-2014
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:49:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <5459FF6B.10903@gentoo.org>
References: 
	<CAGfcS_kUKB-U5iggJ+ieZF+m_0n_AH4DZSqBF1qgKaQVG5LjHA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <CAGfcS_mmV0O1J_dM60dccbYbPrSQzrNWQCf6W=EG+04ycAGSAg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1415184102.15134.6.camel@gentoo.org> <5459FF6B.10903@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: ed7b2043-45cd-4c4e-b023-68f378315d90
X-Archives-Hash: e2e31dc3f771d0610e9a212a0703d27b

El mié, 05-11-2014 a las 11:43 +0100, Alexander Berntsen escribió:
> On 05/11/14 11:41, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I was wondering about making mandatory for Gentoo developers to
> > also be subscribed to gentoo-dev ML
> The only possible outcomes of this is that people either disobey the
> rule, or route all that traffic to its own directory that they
> effectively treat as a rubbish bin.

Yeah, but, in fact, most people are using gentoo-dev ML for discussing
important things and, currently, people don't wanting to follow them can
always tell us that we should have discussed all that in other list that
they are forced to follow. 

I mean: they can still ignore the threads there... but they are on their
own if some important decision is taken there and they missed it because
they send all mails to their trash.