From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47226138825 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38E1BE093E; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4D1E093D for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (88.Red-81-36-183.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [81.36.183.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76B31340493 for ; Wed, 5 Nov 2014 10:41:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1415184102.15134.6.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Re: Call for Council Agenda Items - 11-Nov-2014 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2014 11:41:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.7 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 7a379e7e-4bd9-4051-b1cc-8fa5fab1f677 X-Archives-Hash: b186921ebe8df5248e2163c7fb6905da El lun, 03-11-2014 a las 22:05 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 7:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > The next Gentoo Council meeting is on 11 Nov 2014 at 19:00 UTC. > > > > The draft agenda will be updated at: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~rich0/council/council_agenda_20141111.txt > > > > The agenda is posted at the URL above. It is not too late for > last-minute additions. You aren't going to let us off this easily, > are you? > I was wondering about making mandatory for Gentoo developers to also be subscribed to gentoo-dev ML because a lot of stuff is discussed there and some people look to not follow threads there until they don't escalate to other lists or to the Council directly :/