Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for Council Agenda Items - 14 Oct 2014

[Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>]

El lun, 13-10-2014 a las 12:06 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> Dnia 2014-10-13, o godz. 11:59:10
> Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> 
> > El lun, 13-10-2014 a las 11:04 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
> > [...]
> > > 1b. samba-4 -- the new version is simply insane and hard-masked now.
> > > Not sure if and when we're going to port it.
> > > 
> > 
> > Not porting samba-4 wouldn't be a regression over current emul packages
> > that only include 32bits libs for stable samba anyway :/
> 
> But it would explicitly prevent people from upgrading to samba-4.
> 

Umm, I guess you are referring on people that can now rely on emul-linux
package providing the samba3 32 bits libs even allowing them to update
to samba4 for the rest. Wouldn't be possible to have some kind of
"compat" package (or slot) that would only build and install the samba3
32bits libs? (that shouldn't collide with the 64 bits libs provided by
plain samba packages as it's the case now with the mix of plain samba
and emul package?)