From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408F513877A for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D29A3E0C70; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DA05E0C51 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (198.Red-2-137-229.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.229.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3A5E33FB23 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 09:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1402909653.2466.1.camel@belkin5> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Council 2014 / 2015 election From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 11:07:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <539BD2E2.7030803@gentoo.org> <539E0590.8040600@mailstation.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 2236c443-91f5-47f5-aba2-5d749359907b X-Archives-Hash: b9226f5462051864f90c8299f6a60768 El lun, 16-06-2014 a las 05:29 +0000, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto escribió: > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > >> > >> For good measure, I'd like to nominate these guys: > >> > > > > To avoid any "legal technicalities" do these nominations actually > > count? The announcement said "anyone can nominate" but I'm not sure > > if this was intended to be limited to current devs. I don't think it > > really matters since devs can always nominate themselves, but I'd hate > > to see somebody accept and then get called out on it. > > Our rules are very clear: anyone can nominate and it's ok to nominate > oneself. > However, they also state that nominations must be accepted. So only the > nominees that accept will be running for the election. > > > Rich > > Regards, > Jorge > In that case... I guess all people is nominated now then and we don't need to nominate anyone else? :/