From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F151381FA for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 19:13:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52AF1E0999; Sat, 10 May 2014 19:13:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1863E0998 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 19:12:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (unknown [2.137.63.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17F9433FDB7 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 19:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1399749174.3147.2.camel@belkin5> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Tinderbox and building everything From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 21:12:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140510175040.6e7c7dc2@gentoo.org> References: <20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org> <536D13CF.2000403@gentoo.org> <2494968.RL10ZYJ7qd@localhost> <536E2087.3050409@gentoo.org> <20140510175040.6e7c7dc2@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: a9f7833d-9945-4eb2-980a-ed7f4ac064f5 X-Archives-Hash: caef7ccdadf1ddb34c72b51d60855cd6 El sáb, 10-05-2014 a las 17:50 +0200, Tom Wijsman escribió: [...] > As for build failures; that boils down to either the maintainer fixing > it as it is their problem, treecleaners cleaning it (but even they have > a long backlog) or someone that is interested to fix it. But in no way > it is QA's problem; as our task is Quality Assurance, which doesn't* > imply fixing maintainer's problems (but does imply m-n / cleaning it). > > * We can try to help to some extent. > At least from my point of view (as member or treecleaners), I would welcome the tinderbox as would help to detect more broken packages, some of them really old and that are not going to be fixed but, as nobody uses them, they are broken for a long time without noticing.