public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:17:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1377796652.5477.15.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130829152248.GA3432@shimane.bonyari.local>

El jue, 29-08-2013 a las 08:22 -0700, Jack Morgan escribió:
[...]
> This is a confusing. What is the real problem you are trying to solve
> here? Stable @system but not having to worry about keywording anything
> else.. like a desktop (gnome, KDE)?
> 

At least from a gnome perspective, we are having some important delays
with some arches:
- Pending keyword requests:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351931 -> sh and sparc
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478254 -> alpha,arm, ia64, ppc*,
sparc
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478256 -> the same
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=387959 -> sh, sparc
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469722 -> s390 (this is probably
the worst case as they are then having a buggy old version)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=469982 -> s390
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471752 -> alpha, ia64, ppc*,
sparc
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472510 -> s390
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476710 -> alpha, arm, ia64,
ppc*, sh, sparc, x86
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478082 -> alpha, sparc
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=466560 -> s390

In summary, s390 looks to be in worst state (as its missing keywording
affects even core packages like gtk+, pango...). But the situation is
also difficult for other arches like alpha and sparc because Agostino
cannot test them at runtime and, then, we think it's not safe to keyword
systemd on them without a runtime check, causing to lose Gnome 3.8
support for its "core" components.

- Stabilizations:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458984 -> m68k

If anyone could look at them, nice, but, from my point of view (not sure
what occurs outside gnome scope), at least m68k and s390 have important
problems to keyword/stabilize soon enough. And also noticed the
important problem of arches like alpha and sparc that are hard to test
at runtime :|

But this is only my impression, maybe some of this arches are more
active in other Gentoo areas.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-29 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-27  9:54 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10 Ulrich Mueller
2013-08-27  9:59 ` [gentoo-project] " Ulrich Mueller
2013-08-27 14:15   ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-08-27 14:27   ` Michał Górny
2013-08-28 11:15 ` [gentoo-project] " Markos Chandras
2013-08-28 11:24   ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-28 17:28     ` Matt Turner
2013-08-28 17:39       ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-08-28 12:52   ` Samuli Suominen
2013-08-28 17:35   ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-08-29  6:09   ` Michael Weber
2013-08-29  8:32     ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-29 11:22       ` Michael Weber
2013-08-29 13:16     ` Ben de Groot
2013-08-29 13:33       ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-29 15:34       ` Jack Morgan
2013-08-29 15:57         ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-08-30  8:52           ` Sergey Popov
2013-08-30 12:53             ` Chris Reffett
2013-09-18 12:32               ` [gentoo-project] " Steven J. Long
2013-08-29 16:06         ` [gentoo-project] " Rich Freeman
2013-08-29 15:56       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-08-29 16:15       ` Matt Turner
2013-08-29 16:25         ` Matt Turner
2013-08-29 20:03       ` William Hubbs
2013-08-29 15:22   ` Jack Morgan
2013-08-29 15:44     ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-29 16:06       ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-08-29 17:49         ` Rich Freeman
2013-09-15 11:41           ` Rich Freeman
2013-09-17 13:04             ` [gentoo-project] Minor arches (was: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10) Ulrich Mueller
2013-09-17 17:40               ` Matt Turner
2013-09-17 18:56               ` Agostino Sarubbo
2013-08-29 17:17     ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2013-08-29 18:33       ` [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10 Tom Wijsman
2013-08-29 19:40         ` Tom Wijsman
2013-08-29 20:23         ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-09-15 15:03       ` Rich Freeman
2013-09-15 15:21         ` Michał Górny
2013-09-15 15:22         ` Pacho Ramos
2013-09-15 19:03           ` Rich Freeman
2013-09-18  2:53             ` Daniel Campbell
2013-09-18  6:51               ` Pacho Ramos
2013-09-18  7:19               ` Sergey Popov
2013-09-18  8:02               ` Daunting developer process? (was Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting) 2013-09-10 Sven Vermeulen
2013-09-18  8:40                 ` Markos Chandras
2013-09-18 12:18                 ` [gentoo-project] Re: Daunting developer process? (was " Steven J. Long
2013-09-18 13:55                   ` Tom Wijsman
2013-09-18 10:42               ` [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10 heroxbd
2013-09-19  4:33                 ` Daniel Campbell
2013-09-19  6:07                   ` Pacho Ramos
2013-09-19 13:21                     ` Daniel Campbell
2013-09-19 19:35                       ` Pacho Ramos
2013-09-19 10:09                   ` Dirkjan Ochtman
2013-09-19 12:37                   ` Tom Wijsman
2013-09-19 13:33                     ` Daniel Campbell
2013-09-15 19:08         ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-09-15 20:18           ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-28 12:46 ` hasufell
2013-08-28 13:18   ` Ulrich Mueller
2013-08-28 14:04     ` hasufell
2013-08-28 17:02       ` Ulrich Mueller
2013-08-29  2:09         ` Patrick Lauer
2013-08-29 11:21           ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-29 13:37             ` hasufell
2013-09-03  9:20 ` [gentoo-project] " Ulrich Mueller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1377796652.5477.15.camel@localhost \
    --to=pacho@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox