From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3706D1381F3 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4809E09F7; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:13:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gold.linx.net (gold.linx.net [195.66.232.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09E71E09E4 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:13:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gold.linx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB9D101E5; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:13:52 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at linx.net Received: from gold.linx.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gold.linx.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id xMko1OpvKtcG; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:13:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:40:21:2:5e9a:d8ff:fee0:64e9] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:40:21:2:5e9a:d8ff:fee0:64e9]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tony@linx.net) by gold.linx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19573101DD; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:13:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <1372148040.2084.4.camel@adrastea> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees) From: Tony Vroon To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hasufell@gentoo.org Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:14:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130625091116.63bdd157@gentoo.org> References: <51BF597B.6060600@gentoo.org> <51C7688A.2020103@gentoo.org> <51C77DD6.3090700@gentoo.org> <51C8C7EB.5090301@gentoo.org> <20130625091116.63bdd157@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5f7fe189-31e5-44a6-820b-ec2d19a4dce6 X-Archives-Hash: a3c453a8d1bc2fdc48e9d525b79d6613 On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 09:11 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > That said, I don't know what the Council could or should do. Should > the Council be responsible for reading discussions and grabbing > whether there was a consensus or not? Or making one in the name of the > whole community? That is not the council's role, at least not as it is defined right now. If more than a vocal minority of developers support a change of direction I would like to hear about it. Obviously I would have liked to have heard about this when I could still action it... but better late than never... Regards, Tony V. P.S. With all this eleventh hour direction-changing I'll submit my manifesto at the eleventh hour. Out of sheer necessity really.