Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted

[Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>]

On 06/20/13 01:50:29, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:18:49 +0200
> hasufell <hasufell@gentoo.org> wrote:
> [...]
[snip]
> > It's a self-maintaining project without any logical connection
> between
> > the legitimation of the project and the legitimation of the 
> members.
> > There is no rotation of members which is absolutely crucial for a
> > position like that.
> 
> I don't see why there should be a rotation: Such a rotation might 
> just
> make people try to get as much as they can from their new powers 
> until
> they are "rotated". If people are seriously involved with devrel,
> handle impartially conflicts and are able to resolve them, why
> replacing them?
> 
[snip]
> 
> Alexis.
> 
Rotation serves to renew the mandate.  e.g. Trustees retire by rotation 
every two years. Since 2008, every trustee that has been retired by 
rotation and stood for reelection has been successful.

Rotation does not mean replaced, just the the opportunity for 
replacement exists.

-- 
Regards,

Roy Bamford
(Neddyseagoon) an member of
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
trustees