From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C09E1381F3 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:26:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA18CE0962; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A10E0954 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (194.Red-2-137-19.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.19.194]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10CB433E589; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1371497197.22480.21.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Candidates (was: Questioning/Interviewing council nominees) From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hasufell@gentoo.org Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:26:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20130617211015.6425ee68@gentoo.org> References: <51BF597B.6060600@gentoo.org> <20130617211015.6425ee68@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 57e4c266-8064-488a-90d1-ca49cc0c3e9a X-Archives-Hash: 4d48dee39dee97e51122e3a95735716c El lun, 17-06-2013 a las 21:10 +0200, Michał Górny escribió: > Dnia 2013-06-17, o godz. 20:46:19 > hasufell napisał(a): > > > Ok, so we have a seperate thread for this. > > > > Anybody who cares can pose a question with context to the current > > council election. > > > > Candidates don't need to answer. > > > > For the previous quetions/answers see the subthread > > "Questioning/Interviewing council nominees" of "Council nominations". > > I'd even ask candidates not to answer in this thread. Just make > a complete list of questions, in the meantime take the nominations > and let the nominees answer them when the list is ready. > > Yeah, I think it's the cleaner solution, otherwise, it's really a pain to review mail when I return home :O