From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Code of Conduct
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 14:10:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369573869.2793.1@NeddySeagoon_SSD> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mrbCH8gKZF=J5Vha+7S2yV6zE9Kgtx5m+7MRXU9nJbow@mail.gmail.com> (from rich@thefreemanclan.net on Sun May 26 13:40:55 2013)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1379 bytes --]
On 2013.05.26 13:40, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Roy Bamford
> <neddyseagoon@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> > I would delete everything from "Examples of inappropriate behavior"
> to
> > the credits at the end. Escalation, punishment and appeal is
> already
> > covered by devrel documentation.
> >
>
> I suspect that lack of punishment was basically the whole reason the
> original CoC was written, and the whole reason the topic came up
> again.
>
> > If you want to say anything about enforcement in the CoC remind
> readers
> > that everyone is responsible for enforcement.
>
> That sounds a bit like nobody is responsible for enforcement. The
> only thing devs can do to basically do what they're already doing -
> having running arguments on the lists. The only way to block
> inappropriate behavior is to moderate it.
>
> Whether we want to do that is up to the community, but the existing
> CoC is fine as-is if you don't want to do anything about enforcement,
> IMHO.
>
> Rich
>
>
We have already tried the <small group> is responsible for enforcement
approach.
Even if we encourage everyone to intervene, most won't, for many
reasons, so in practice we are back to the <small group> again.
--
Regards,
Roy Bamford
(Neddyseagoon) a member of
elections
gentoo-ops
forum-mods
trustees
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-26 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 11:46 [gentoo-project] Gentoo Code of Conduct Tomáš Chvátal
2013-05-24 12:59 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-24 13:16 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-05-24 13:46 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-24 17:13 ` Markos Chandras
2013-05-25 10:18 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-05-26 11:32 ` Roy Bamford
2013-05-26 12:40 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 13:10 ` Roy Bamford [this message]
2013-05-26 13:58 ` Ian Stakenvicius
2013-05-26 14:46 ` Rich Freeman
2013-05-26 15:06 ` Denis Dupeyron
2013-05-26 17:06 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-05-26 19:03 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos
2013-05-26 20:00 ` Dale
2013-05-26 19:51 ` Robin H. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1369573869.2793.1@NeddySeagoon_SSD \
--to=neddyseagoon@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox