From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCA31381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 11:33:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32305E0D18; Sun, 26 May 2013 11:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27735E0D0A for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 11:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.142] (helo=NeddySeagoon_SSD) by smarthost03.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UgZBe-00017G-KK for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 May 2013 11:32:30 +0000 Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 12:32:11 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Code of Conduct To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: (from scarabeus@gentoo.org on Fri May 24 12:46:38 2013) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.4.13 Message-Id: <1369567950.2793.0@NeddySeagoon_SSD> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1VvP3+5NPAYHn/uMzzgJ" X-Originating-Smarthost03-IP: [62.3.120.142] X-Archives-Salt: 387447bb-5794-49de-8842-3ea4571b7a4f X-Archives-Hash: bee7faa1594a4e640f0a1e49202921c4 --=-1VvP3+5NPAYHn/uMzzgJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2013.05.24 12:46, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 Chv=C3=A1tal wrote: > Hello guys, >=20 > after last bunch of mails and internal complains I decided it is time > to do > something proactive. >=20 > So I give you revised Gentoo Code of Conduct. >=20 [snip] >=20 > Cheers >=20 > Tom >=20 Tom, I would delete everything from "Examples of inappropriate behavior" to=20 the credits at the end. Escalation, punishment and appeal is already=20 covered by devrel documentation. This will avoid the, "Well, its not listed so its ok" reaction. If you want to say anything about enforcement in the CoC remind readers=20 that everyone is responsible for enforcement. Its key to defusing the=20 situations covered by the CoC that a reminder is delivered very=20 quickly. That's in part why the Proctors project failed ... the=20 elapsed time between an incident arising and a response. Even a few=20 hours is too long.=20 --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (Neddyseagoon) a member of elections gentoo-ops forum-mods trustees = --=-1VvP3+5NPAYHn/uMzzgJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRofLOAAoJEFZf0zWq3OcJqk4P/jyUBBsQPsFixxl2tzUmFBN1 wn18fT3gAI0IqpMRJ/stfrDkt/HTX/Ipi2XhTd6bdPZ1Bz3ljlp4F4TO0j0Vv1aC zcOUyA0D4DsWHdrhw5TKZ4lnpcTjIOk55vRbwN4U5rZ0OwScNEgXN7qMffjQN5MC oHlTN6KOhnk8P114SHdgBG8rgyYcilHCS93xM10K7uNlXyPzTtwaXTWmH5iUzWrb I6mF6aGbrYmQHSDfdBVamWEcZ6x8wTHwc6fZS/dP+Ju0Z7jb2KkrW/bTv5pt2n8G Uix3ngdtpGOlXaD+lkYNzJPZBS7A4dxJOs3fELFZjD1AJJvSzVvqG5m7yJkzt4jT tsuuGpQhPeY/8DAWXevop1DC+2/cFUeg+uwvIltWKBqzoCpOhbIL5oqApze33Djo OuwMRkmqqyMnaJXrRgUhyEmWwEzw9OkkqOyIp5IYh6hxY6cyCasdkZU2vn+9yGi5 qZgrs7ydd6b47LTdZlhbQdaE4PopkhzW74pxK+riachqlK2PN9c1Zhx/bNZshuaQ JlLLL4sarMyRL81mr+zcyPGLBLOss9ZlV6BDg3m33Xlwmoup4oJxiDN4NNU88klN tgoPDyoW8Nb1JcM/lGMww7oZdR79Gs2Rr6QbGr8OSVE6sp3LycFkTMYhr02C4wwq TIkW5Ejgn9+Mqs4b0j+p =o/0K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-1VvP3+5NPAYHn/uMzzgJ--