From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-project+bounces-2379-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E991381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Apr 2013 21:51:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13730E08BF;
	Sat,  6 Apr 2013 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7460CE08B5
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Apr 2013 21:51:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.33] (255.Red-2-137-58.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.58.255])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	(Authenticated sender: pacho)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 776D333DD3B
	for <gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat,  6 Apr 2013 21:50:53 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1365285000.12962.0.camel@localhost>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting
 2013-04-09
From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 23:50:00 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net>
References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <20826.59983.990551.148156@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <CAG2jQ8iwyEr8K_2JOiE-yV70eoLe2LAb3kEo+hDPD4+h9s8pgg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20130403110754.41276e21@sera-20.lan>
	 <20831.474.441795.677277@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
	 <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.0 
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-project+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-project+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list <gentoo-project.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Archives-Salt: ec570bb5-2ecd-47bf-842d-98746f6affc3
X-Archives-Hash: 751b07b292a3a0ad97297c4ca5b0e3ec

El sáb, 06-04-2013 a las 15:43 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 18:54:50 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
> > I'd be a little more proactive and deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1 immediately
> > (which would correspond to the 4 years mentioned above). When doing a
> > version or revision bump, the ebuild should be updated to use a newer
> > EAPI. There can be exceptions, e.g. for security bumps.
> 
> Toolchain packages are EAPI 0 and we aren't changing.
> 

and why? Only for knowing the reasons :)