El vie, 05-10-2012 a las 06:31 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't see any advantage in deprecating intermediate EAPIs, before we
> > deprecate EAPI 0. What problem are you trying to solve?
> >
> 
> ++
> 
> I'm all for a policy that says to use slot deps whenever appropriate,
> or to otherwise do things that actually have a real impact on the
> quality/functionality of the distro.  That might in practice mean
> using newer EAPIs on a lot of stuff.  However, I don't see the value
> in bumping for its own sake.
> 
> Legislate outcomes, not details.
> 
> Rich
> 
> 

Probably deprecating eapi1 would be interesting as probably most ebuilds
would benefit from having additional src_prepare and src_configure
phases.

Regarding eapi4, it also has interesting changes like automatically
passing --disable-dependency-tracking, they also ban dosed and dohard