From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 19:35:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349458555.2200.71.camel@belkin4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mz9he7miCatepBR0oaf7Up-qM84QEUKEWfjWWeDGzirQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 970 bytes --]
El vie, 05-10-2012 a las 06:31 -0400, Rich Freeman escribió:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > I don't see any advantage in deprecating intermediate EAPIs, before we
> > deprecate EAPI 0. What problem are you trying to solve?
> >
>
> ++
>
> I'm all for a policy that says to use slot deps whenever appropriate,
> or to otherwise do things that actually have a real impact on the
> quality/functionality of the distro. That might in practice mean
> using newer EAPIs on a lot of stuff. However, I don't see the value
> in bumping for its own sake.
>
> Legislate outcomes, not details.
>
> Rich
>
>
Probably deprecating eapi1 would be interesting as probably most ebuilds
would benefit from having additional src_prepare and src_configure
phases.
Regarding eapi4, it also has interesting changes like automatically
passing --disable-dependency-tracking, they also ban dosed and dohard
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 9:24 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 Fabian Groffen
2012-09-25 9:59 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-27 6:19 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-27 22:13 ` Brian Harring
2012-09-28 0:14 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-28 12:12 ` Brian Harring
2012-10-03 5:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2012-10-03 6:44 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-10-03 6:56 ` Matt Turner
2012-10-03 8:31 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-29 15:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-09-29 16:04 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-29 16:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-09-25 19:32 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-02 11:30 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-10-03 17:18 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-04 18:32 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-05 6:28 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-10-05 6:41 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-05 6:43 ` Patrick Lauer
2012-10-05 8:46 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-10-05 10:31 ` Rich Freeman
2012-10-05 14:51 ` Jeff Horelick
2012-10-05 17:35 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349458555.2200.71.camel@belkin4 \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox