El vie, 05-10-2012 a las 08:28 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió:
> On 04-10-2012 20:32:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding
> > > IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with
> > > portage team also as they have the current implementation
> > 
> > And then, I think council should clarify what to do with current usages
> > in the tree with eapi0-4
> 
> Why should the Council clarify that?
> 

Who should be then? This has been already talked in gentoo-dev and we
still don't know what to do with current ebuild/eclasses already relying
on them, and reverting them to some other solution would later need us
to re-migrate them to current one when it's specified in next EAPI. This
is all explained in original message I send, the problem is that there
is a total lack of knowledge about how to proceed and what to do and,
then, I think that Council should decide it.

> (Not that we're unwilling, but I don't see why Council should be the
> initiator here.)
> 
>