From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 08:41:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1349419290.2200.68.camel@belkin4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121005062851.GI912@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1085 bytes --]
El vie, 05-10-2012 a las 08:28 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió:
> On 04-10-2012 20:32:41 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding
> > > IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with
> > > portage team also as they have the current implementation
> >
> > And then, I think council should clarify what to do with current usages
> > in the tree with eapi0-4
>
> Why should the Council clarify that?
>
Who should be then? This has been already talked in gentoo-dev and we
still don't know what to do with current ebuild/eclasses already relying
on them, and reverting them to some other solution would later need us
to re-migrate them to current one when it's specified in next EAPI. This
is all explained in original message I send, the problem is that there
is a total lack of knowledge about how to proceed and what to do and,
then, I think that Council should decide it.
> (Not that we're unwilling, but I don't see why Council should be the
> initiator here.)
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-25 9:24 [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 Fabian Groffen
2012-09-25 9:59 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-27 6:19 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-27 22:13 ` Brian Harring
2012-09-28 0:14 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-28 12:12 ` Brian Harring
2012-10-03 5:04 ` Donnie Berkholz
2012-10-03 6:44 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-10-03 6:56 ` Matt Turner
2012-10-03 8:31 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-29 15:51 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-09-29 16:04 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-09-29 16:10 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2012-09-25 19:32 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-02 11:30 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-10-03 17:18 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-04 18:32 ` Pacho Ramos
2012-10-05 6:28 ` Fabian Groffen
2012-10-05 6:41 ` Pacho Ramos [this message]
2012-10-05 6:43 ` Patrick Lauer
2012-10-05 8:46 ` Ulrich Mueller
2012-10-05 10:31 ` Rich Freeman
2012-10-05 14:51 ` Jeff Horelick
2012-10-05 17:35 ` Pacho Ramos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1349419290.2200.68.camel@belkin4 \
--to=pacho@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox