From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB5D138010 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 21:02:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 927EF21C00C for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 21:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC0A21C190 for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:32:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (35.Red-2-136-69.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.136.69.35]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7531633C1EF for ; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 09-10-2012 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1349284689.2200.50.camel@belkin4> References: <20120925092414.GL37574@gentoo.org> <1348601570.3603.4.camel@belkin4> <20121002113020.GZ37574@gentoo.org> <1349284689.2200.50.camel@belkin4> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7bqsG23PJEgOxYZI1JOC" Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:32:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1349375561.2200.57.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: c69e9c1f-4618-4a9a-8a10-96b2fdc37a3f X-Archives-Hash: ed89dad655679c43fbbfc9f5c9333835 --=-7bqsG23PJEgOxYZI1JOC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mi=C3=A9, 03-10-2012 a las 19:18 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribi=C3=B3: > El mar, 02-10-2012 a las 13:30 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribi=C3=B3: > > Pacho, > >=20 > > On 25-09-2012 21:32:50 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > This is from: > > > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/260662 > > >=20 > > > But corrected to remember preferred usage of in_iuse from eutils.ecla= ss > > > as remembered by mgorny in that thread: > >=20 > > I've considered your point, but concluded that at this moment, the > > Council basically has nothing to do here. It seems obvious that it > > needs something to be defined in a next EAPI, but the Council is not th= e > > body to invent that. > > Please discuss with involved people (Portage devs?) and prepare a patch > > to PMS that can be used as feature for the next EAPI. Brian's > > IUSE_FLATTENED might be a simple and good solution for that. > >=20 > > Best, > > Fabian > >=20 >=20 > And what about current usage in the tree with current eapis? Regarding > IUSE_FLATTENED I have no problem with it, but will need to talk with > portage team also as they have the current implementation And then, I think council should clarify what to do with current usages in the tree with eapi0-4 Thanks --=-7bqsG23PJEgOxYZI1JOC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlBt1kgACgkQCaWpQKGI+9RqgwCfUo960OEXA/nGYbmM2lHE/f3p +HwAn2ncg3XECUQ5M/T4rHdv+KGVFikw =u3op -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7bqsG23PJEgOxYZI1JOC--