From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SBMs1-0000FA-Pz for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:02:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64954E030B for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C239E06B0 for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:04:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (187.Red-2-137-59.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [2.137.59.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pacho) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66C2B1B401A for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2012-04-03 From: Pacho Ramos To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20120323232300.64fc1729@gentoo.org> References: <20328.10318.193096.854402@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1332236498.9921.6.camel@belkin4> <1332268650.9921.16.camel@belkin4> <20120323232300.64fc1729@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VUrrlGH/QI1PBogZSaid" Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:04:53 +0100 Message-ID: <1332576293.25906.0.camel@belkin4> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-Archives-Salt: df0ad791-e0dd-432f-be51-987ed94dbff7 X-Archives-Hash: 2bb99c69ca29380d367c8ef6de797561 --=-VUrrlGH/QI1PBogZSaid Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El vie, 23-03-2012 a las 23:23 -0600, Ryan Hill escribi=C3=B3: > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:37:30 +0100 > Pacho Ramos wrote: >=20 > > El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 11:32 -0400, Mike Gilbert escribi=C3=B3: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote= : > > > > Since there is no need to stay in the herd some prefixed time, I se= e no > > > > reason to allow developers to be in mail aliases without adding the= m to > > > > herds.xml, and this allows others to "easily" review herds.xml look= ing > > > > for empty herds. > > >=20 > > > From what you've said, the mail alias should just be ignored when > > > reviewing herds. > > >=20 > > > It is possible that the people on the alias are simply curious and > > > have no intention of maintaining anything. I don't have a problem wit= h > > > that. > >=20 > > But we need to clearly state that, when a herd is empty in herds.xml we > > should consider their packages as orphan even if some devs are listed i= n > > the alias. >=20 > I thought that was the case already. Why would devs on the alias be > considered maintainers in the first place? >=20 >=20 If it's clear that devs on alias shouldn't be considered as maintainers when herds.xml shows that one as empty, ok then, nothing more to discuss :) --=-VUrrlGH/QI1PBogZSaid Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAk9tgCUACgkQCaWpQKGI+9TlrQCeNPDi08NgLRoXUcuqyPOoZ0xr 4ZIAn16LymmC2qQqqgX2g0lYUsVpGfC1 =jeov -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VUrrlGH/QI1PBogZSaid--