From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RKleC-000374-W4 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:47:05 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE18721C043; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694B321C040 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (ap.ran.gpi.ru [195.209.218.156]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pva) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 308D61B400B for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 06:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 From: Peter Volkov To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> <20111026183551.32cfffe8@pomiocik.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:43:49 +0400 Message-ID: <1320043429.13577.5.camel@tablet> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: f50cacac-184f-4230-a924-9d50de22ac58 X-Archives-Hash: 5e6ee50bce67b8d50217cea18e307f9e =D0=92 =D0=A1=D1=80=D0=B4, 26/10/2011 =D0=B2 18:35 +0200, Micha=C5=82 G=C3= =B3rny =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:30:25 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > In less than two weeks, the council will meet again. This is the tim= e > > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda > > to vote on. >=20 > As an extension of ChangeLog topic, I'd like to suggest to require > developers to commit packages with matching (same) ChangeLog entries > and commit messages. I don't see how this logic may work in case you need to modify Changelog, so ... wontfix :) -- Peter.