From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JyFmx-0001xP-W7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 20 May 2008 00:33:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FAB9E0458; Tue, 20 May 2008 00:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC93BE0458 for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 00:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.211] (c-76-18-195-255.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [76.18.195.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFC465363 for ; Tue, 20 May 2008 00:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Leadership Structure From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-project In-Reply-To: <48321161.1060901@gentoo.org> References: <48321161.1060901@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sDHwH1+EyAkaev37WFHR" Organization: Gentoo Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:32:18 -0400 Message-Id: <1211243538.14631.21.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 X-Archives-Salt: e8b5e1ae-e451-455a-9373-ec3e6ccda238 X-Archives-Hash: 0b3349ee1ddb1473d7b76ff4a4ffa97b --=-sDHwH1+EyAkaev37WFHR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 19:46 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: > I was thinking a little of some of pros/cons of how Gentoo is organized, > and maybe a few steps would help to improve it a little. I'd consider > this really to just be an item for discussion in terms of longer-term > goals - not something that we should try to institute as a knee-jerk > response to the current GLEP 39 debate. Just to clarify one thing. Allot of my thoughts, some of those of other board members, etc. Were in place long before the GLEP 39 issue. Any action the trustees are taking now is by no means a knee-jerk reaction. If anything it has simply expedited the time line of things that were to come and be discussed either way. --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. amd64/Java/Trustees Gentoo Foundation --=-sDHwH1+EyAkaev37WFHR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkgyHBIACgkQPrChP8zZLyYGcgCfQlMK1atloleuCjcq+pgHW+QK E+8AnjhWQk9zHuWYqTfc1//bleHZprID =Vt5T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sDHwH1+EyAkaev37WFHR-- -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list