Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting

[Peter Volkov <pva@gentoo.org>]

В Вск, 18/05/2008 в 13:20 +0200, Denis Dupeyron пишет: 
> That's one point of view. Another is that some policies have been
> written in different times for different reasons, and may need to be
> clarified or even updated to suit better the present situation. That's
> the problem with time, it doesn't stand still and things happen
> leading to situations changing.

I agree that policies should be updated. But not retroactively.


В Вск, 18/05/2008 в 11:16 -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. пишет:
> Ok, so are we following common sense or policy?

Policy whatever that states and common sense in other cases...

> If it's common sense, why would it have been so hard to clearly state
> and document the above?

As I understand Ciaran for historical reasons. But what we should do in
case less then 50% of council attend the meeting is there.

> Policies are stated, not assumed. We have way to many undocumented,
> word of mouth, common sense policies. If we are going to run around
> enforcing things. It must be documented, not assumed.

Sure. And I think that somebody should suggest council something
concrete on how to update the policy. But this does not change the fact
that what happened was at times we had different policy.

> FYI, IMHO common sense says we give them a chance to make up for the
> meeting. Before rush to punishment. So who's common sense is correct per
> policy? Mine or yours?

No, this's not punishment. That's just procedural act we should take to
be sure that policies we thought about work.


Well, too many mails here so I think now I should decrease the noise
here and shut up and wait for council actions.

-- 
Peter.

-- 
gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list