From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JxUkH-0006Gh-4g for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 22:19:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C076E0387; Sat, 17 May 2008 22:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost02.mail.mbr-roch.zen.net.uk [212.23.3.141]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCFBE0387 for ; Sat, 17 May 2008 22:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [62.3.120.141] (helo=spike) by smarthost02.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JxUkF-0005wA-4n for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 May 2008 22:19:15 +0000 Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 23:19:03 +0100 From: Roy Bamford Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20080515204913.GA22285@comet> (from dberkholz@gentoo.org on Thu May 15 21:49:14 2008) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.22 Message-Id: <1211062749.2652.1@spike> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-Smarthost02-IP: [62.3.120.141] X-Archives-Salt: 2083c786-46fb-4070-9751-a83350cbeb57 X-Archives-Hash: b268d7adb25e68101e4233aa1b9e743f -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2008.05.15 21:49, Donnie Berkholz wrote: [snip] > Open up the floodgates, folks. What do you think, what should we do?=20 > I look forward to hearing your advice. >=20 > Thanks, > Donnie > --=20 > gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list >=20 All, There seems to be almost total apathy to this thread. I expected at=20 least as much interest as the thread that announced the three=20 expulsions. Right now, it is important that Council makes up its collective mind=20 and does something. Like many management decisions, what is decided is=20 far less important than that we have a speedy decision so the rest of=20 Gentoo can get on with the implementation. Delay is the only option we don't have. - --=20 Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees Written as my personal view, not on behalf of any team I am a member of -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgvWd0ACgkQTE4/y7nJvatCQgCfZ2aP5fQ8ssYmBncw2m3LIX+t 0vcAn1i7I1y2EnN2wth5wTLuxKlSW45c =3DtTWR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list