From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jx0no-0006o4-La for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 May 2008 14:20:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F33B3E0514; Fri, 16 May 2008 14:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0841E0514 for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 14:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.211] (c-76-18-195-255.hsd1.fl.comcast.net [76.18.195.255]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F16641EF for ; Fri, 16 May 2008 14:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Special meeting [WAS: Council meeting summary for 8 May 2008] From: "William L. Thomson Jr." To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20080516153749.54423cw9y730838k@www2.mailstation.de> References: <20080515215435.0085a029@anaconda.krait.us> <1210944002.1517.168.camel@liasis.inforead.com> <20080516153749.54423cw9y730838k@www2.mailstation.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9WjdnlqHWAhp89FtfKw1" Organization: Gentoo Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:20:51 -0400 Message-Id: <1210947651.31529.16.camel@wlt.obsidian-studios.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.0 X-Archives-Salt: d6b71fd4-64d4-40a9-aaa4-8395332785a5 X-Archives-Hash: db69ddd58d3e60fbf2004ed33085f96d --=-9WjdnlqHWAhp89FtfKw1 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 15:37 +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: > Hello Ferris, >=20 > > This leaves the subject of the non-meeting unresolved and also the > > pending appeals. Probably we should hold the election quickly and pass > > that on to the next Council, but I think we should hear from those who > > have appeals pending on that. Thus, the CC, assuming email is being > > forwarded correctly. >=20 > Personally, I think GLEP39 should be followed and an election should =20 > take place. The suggestions I've read so far, albeit certainly meant =20 > well, all have a "taste", IMHO, and would make (parts of) Gentoo look =20 > bad. If we do proceed with electing a new council. It's not the end of the world. Since we would be doing so in a couple months anyway, no? So just expediting the elections a bit. --=20 William L. Thomson Jr. amd64/Java/Trustees Gentoo Foundation --=-9WjdnlqHWAhp89FtfKw1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkgtmEMACgkQPrChP8zZLybt0QCgjadrmvMryxxmOZsGmpCXJv3r BSEAn1pgKoizorzpUC5wilCbdgwdpQaz =Bg02 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9WjdnlqHWAhp89FtfKw1-- -- gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org mailing list