public inbox for gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Graaff <graaff@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] maintainer-wanted bugcount
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:03:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1196107396.19657.13.camel@ip6-localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fiegou$lkm$1@ger.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1527 bytes --]

On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 14:12 +0100, Markus Ullmann wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> > What is bad about the current state of leaving maintainer-wanted bugs 
> > open? What problem is it causing that you want to fix?
> 
> Currently a bunch of them are either
> - dead upstream for quite some time
> - don't work with a current system

As mentioned these should be closed as WONTFIX or CANTFIX. We'd need
people to go through bugzilla and have a look at all maintainer-wanted
bugs that are, say, more than one year old. 

I actually did look into this briefly a few months ago, based on the
same observation of so many maintainer-wanted bugs open. Based on
looking at some random bugs my observation was that most upstreams still
exist. Whether or not they are dead is another matter that requires some
more time, as does assessing if the package is still relevant for the
tree.

I'd be happy to revisit this and start combing bugzilla in a bit more
structured way and close maintainer-wanted bugs when applicable, but it
will be slow going. Any other volunteers? I imagine a quick write-up of
goals and "rules" a la treecleaners should be enough to kick this off.

Voting could really help to bring maintainer-wanted bugs to our
attention. Currently only 3 bugs have any votes for them. If more people
would dish out their votes it would become more clear which packages
would please a large number of people and there may be more incentive
for maintainers to take them.

Kind regards,

Hans

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-26 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-26  9:46 [gentoo-project] maintainer-wanted bugcount Markus Ullmann
2007-11-26 10:05 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] " Donnie Berkholz
2007-11-26 11:09   ` Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
2007-11-26 13:12   ` Markus Ullmann
2007-11-26 19:34     ` Steve Long
2007-11-26 20:03     ` Hans de Graaff [this message]
2007-11-27 17:44       ` [gentoo-project] " Steve Long
     [not found] ` <20071126110158.GG14557@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net>
     [not found]   ` <fiel19$567$1@ger.gmane.org>
     [not found]     ` <200711261754.27816.george@gentoo.org>
2007-11-26 18:16       ` Markus Ullmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1196107396.19657.13.camel@ip6-localhost \
    --to=graaff@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox