From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0A3138334 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D68EE08AB; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58095E08A8 for ; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83EF034B46C; Sat, 21 Sep 2019 18:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <109eea13088507d0b4dd87da6d3463e75ae07e84.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [RFC] Undertakers: appeal policy From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 20:48:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <3aab702403d9a7e0bf7246f14a5130acd464ca45.camel@gentoo.org> <20190921105536.2764e1e6@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> <8C6FAD3C-F48F-4B2D-98A5-0CD5CDEF1DF9@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-NUQWZ2EQXQUm+KS72kUg" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 7340379c-3759-4fc3-83f0-38c26b2ea625 X-Archives-Hash: aed009d5f15eb115ba2a68b5aa86057a --=-NUQWZ2EQXQUm+KS72kUg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 14:36 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > Our PMS is largely maintained > by a former dev who many do not get along with. This is not true. It is maintained by a few active Gentoo devs, and by a quick peak last non-Gentoo-dev patch was committed in 2012. In fact, EAPI 7 has been rejected in Paludis. > Our founder isn't > really involved as a dev but never wanders too far and maintains a > fairly friendly fork. 'Friendly fork', right. I guess everyone is welcome to watch and make his/her own opinion. However, it doesn't sound like you really have verified any of those statements. That's just to correct things. Now, guys, can we please stay on topic?=20 I welcome all your support but of the three replies so far, nobody has provided any opinion on the proposal in question. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-NUQWZ2EQXQUm+KS72kUg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl2GcH5fFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA6snwgAwekpFAjgV6TprVLd54mQzriMq15bijhoeMtwMr60Fi79IxkVRixhqNaW a18hQ7yrPKSxKYPA9wzaL3ANIGG+JE7hNEx1Bui3F1bAWHhIJNR5zYR5amIKYH7e z3O9+SwvsYJZIZxN0a7eG0pNar6DAbv7GWDCxijxg0WHdi2aMzrAW4duYiz0B3dA 1d69D0MJZGQww1oS88HxDmlpDxOc6XS4Dyr5Z+NW+y5dF0U1kb81nszvYndwwPLG 1Lm2BawFiZ+dG4ah8MT6KtkxrIhR8laAxJPPIekvW6YnfQdqOewvNu1nY0oRtBHs 5/eFFySTcHcYlfLkPRLFpoFfD4HPhQ== =7ZcJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-NUQWZ2EQXQUm+KS72kUg--