From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85B281382C5 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7ABFDE0825; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52598E0824 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 10:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0f1ee1c3d7e95cc5fbd0e36807ffdde20b26512b.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2021-05-09 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 12:39:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> <00d9f2b305889294210bb01748d2045a0cd603f0.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 4ae34f6f-e162-483d-afda-e2383e535301 X-Archives-Hash: d3abfcc9639014e401675b56a924f873 On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 11:15 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 03 May 2021, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 22:22 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > The way I see it is, if the council wants funding for something > > > they > > > can request it from the foundation, but I don't think they can > > > direct > > > the foundation not to fund something someone else requests. > > > > > > Also, given Antarus' response in the thread, I'm not sure there is > > > anything for council to discuss. > > > Does 'being not sure' authorize you to arbitrarily decide to skip > > agenda items from the community? > > I don't read William's reponse in such a way. The Council can still > discuss the issue, and the Foundation may or may not listen. > > Ultimately it is up to them how they want to spend their money. > I believe that part is clear. However the response is to be read, there's no item for this in the agenda. So it's pretty much a single Council member individually deciding what Council discusses or not. -- Best regards, Michał Górny