From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24619158020 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 03:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C989E086A; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 03:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EF08E086A for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2022 03:34:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0caf3dd77fa632193b815b8fa45c6f4103bd6c62.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Agenda for 2022-12-11 council meeting From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Matt Turner Cc: council@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2022 04:34:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20221204202153.qpdjwtvy6xca3i3b@framework> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: a240c12b-e5b7-4de7-91e9-4c0c3fc5e946 X-Archives-Hash: c5b5b07bdb47cde446c5d83730991dc5 On Sat, 2022-12-10 at 12:41 -0600, John Helmert III wrote: > Bit late to bring this up, but we're supposed to do our twice-yearly > architecture status review in the December meeting (thanks to Arthur > for noticing on IRC). >=20 > [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Council#Arch-status_Reviews >=20 Are there any architecture-specific concerns right now? I think our arch teams are doing great, the majority of arches are handled fine. We have stable/dev profiles for loong now. Really concerning arches (alpha, mips) are exp. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny