From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A809138334 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:56:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDCACE0916; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C60E1E090A for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot (c134-66.icpnet.pl [85.221.134.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C093234B6C6; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 15:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0a3d9d42d62fd2d9c126a97174d4582a110f213a.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2019-10-13 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: council@gentoo.org Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 17:56:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8n8DRiqPNDvO9yn+ttpE" User-Agent: Evolution 3.32.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: ab008c7d-d51b-4e21-900b-4ba2ab610b83 X-Archives-Hash: 6bfdb844b9a9abfaf8ae20c386308ba2 --=-8n8DRiqPNDvO9yn+ttpE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 14:06 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time > to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda > to discuss or vote on. >=20 > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting). >=20 I would like to request the Council to clarify/generalize their decision from 2019-05-12 meeting regarding valid forms of activity for a developer. In this meeting, the Council confirmed that committing a proxy (without direct commit access) is a suitable form of activity for an existing developer not to be retired. I would like to ask whether the same form of activity (i.e. high level of activity as a proxied maintainer) is suitable for recruiting someone as non-commit access developer. If yes, then I'd like to ask why Recruiters are rejecting such a recruit, and requiring him to go through full procedure including establishing commit access. [1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-8n8DRiqPNDvO9yn+ttpE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGTBAABCgB9FiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAl2Q1BFfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM3 NkE4NDUwOTQwOThEMjhDQzhCMjZDNTYzOUFEQUUyMzI5RTI0MEUACgkQY5ra4jKe JA4HIQf/Wg+TlC2hg/s8T75zM4q3ePyMZRj5PdQrGEnG/Fx+aykJ9qbLEjhr1+sd 2UM0yjivNb4dwKKE4J8INFZvfLtB6CHLksPazBe61SDtZ+c1rI7yTe6NgjmmBovA NMP7iNqPhUC2vN6T6Ff2UgMa4bkqImvkBnnw4i+bKlAmnxpp6kxKY3RpzQmYjssa e/utQJgot3ZWRVUzpcpr0Nj7zmvPd0aWdhxaGlyrqWmu5iXL9gUCB7z1+bHjZ37r Z2JuTzTv8hQ+QQbC1B5ULFuRZ2/TuqzAsIrCU6csV8iiOZUXTlU5ss4765fhdgB3 RcN7yGLUXm091F/f2AJOD+4l9Rf6jw== =Cj+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8n8DRiqPNDvO9yn+ttpE--