On Sun, 2019-09-29 at 14:06 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> In two weeks from now, the council will meet again. This is the time
> to raise and prepare items that the council should put on the agenda
> to discuss or vote on.
> 
> Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to
> repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously
> suggested one (since the last meeting).
> 

I would like to request the Council to clarify/generalize their decision
from 2019-05-12 meeting regarding valid forms of activity for
a developer.

In this meeting, the Council confirmed that committing a proxy (without
direct commit access) is a suitable form of activity for an existing
developer not to be retired.  I would like to ask whether the same form
of activity (i.e. high level of activity as a proxied maintainer) is
suitable for recruiting someone as non-commit access developer.

If yes, then I'd like to ask why Recruiters are rejecting such
a recruit, and requiring him to go through full procedure including
establishing commit access.


[1] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20190512-summary.txt

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny