From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07ADD58973 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:25:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 843A221C0CF; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD5F321C0CE; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2a00:f41:30dd:540a:3a94:52c9:a0f6:3c60] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:f41:30dd:540a:3a94:52c9:a0f6:3c60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ACCF340C3F; Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:25:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org> <56AFB120.3020104@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2016-02-14 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 16:25:15 +0100 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org,Dirkjan Ochtman CC: Gentoo Development ,Gentoo Council Message-ID: <08D58FA9-866D-44F3-BB58-6CCA6D5CCBE8@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 9ead8fbd-2180-467a-a2ad-ae2e9c74f2d0 X-Archives-Hash: 1af0055100a5c16795dea84a919eec7c Dnia 2 lutego 2016 09:06:30 CET, Dirkjan Ochtman napisał(a): >On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 8:25 PM, Justin Lecher (jlec) >wrote: >> Please reply to this message with any items you would like us to >discuss >> or vote on. > >Since we were unable to reach consensus so far, I would like to submit >the issue of picking a new XML validation language to the Council. > >Pretty much all the relevant information is in this thread: >https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a1825d5b2a2a16e9e027f6e8dc6d1fd8 > >If RELAX NG were chosen, I volunteer to convert all the DTDs that are >still relevant. (Hopefully someone else will step forward if XML >Schema is chosen, instead.) I think I was the only person wanting XML Schema. Feel free to go with RELAX NG since that seems to work for more current uses. Just please keep only one format in the repository, and do conversion infra-side. Preferably let's create a new repo for that, and aim at replacing all DTDs (that are still used) with it. One more question though: is it possible to express key references in RELAX NG? I'm thinking of projects.xml where should match some other . > >Cheers, > >Dirkjan -- Best regards, Michał Górny (by phone)