On 01/15/2017 11:23 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> It should be noted that an unauthorized disclosure of sensitive
> information by any party involved would be a base for a strong
> disciplinary action.

Overall fair procedures and points, but this particular part punishes
whistleblowing, from inside *or* outside Gentoo. If a given
target/subject decides to share all related communications to make their
points publicly, the above suggestion recommends the subject is silenced
and/or ejected for revealing something directly involving them.

If the intent is to make whistleblowing risky or otherwise (socially)
dangerous, then it'll get the job done, but at a cost to community
morale over the long term. I don't support a procedure that punishes
people for pointing out when it (the procedure) is not working correctly.

I think a more fair restriction would be to place it on Comrel and
Council, as they are being trusted to not share private information.
What the two (or more?) sides do in a dispute isn't something we can
reasonably control, except on our own infrastructure. I find it
unnecessary and meaningless to place sanctions on users or other
participants of a conflict if they choose to make their communications
public. It's /their/ dirty laundry, after all.
-- 
Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer
OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C  1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6