From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B0C8138239 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2758EE07FA; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5BAAE0798 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 08:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <00d9f2b305889294210bb01748d2045a0cd603f0.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2021-05-09 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 10:59:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <4775262.irdbgypaU6@pinacolada> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.40.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: de2d5d88-b249-4c16-8c1e-4c343d5e84df X-Archives-Hash: 3cefd7f339082b3f65f2c16e67fa4f44 On Sun, 2021-05-02 at 22:22 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, May 02, 2021 at 09:07:11PM +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 2021-05-01 17:14, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > > There's rumors going around that Agostino's tinderbox basically > > > already burned through our entire 2021 AWS Open Source credit budget > > > and has overdrawn it significantly. > > > > > > Independent of whether this rumor is true or not, I would like to > > > discuss > > > * how we can avoid such a situation in the future, > > > * and how we can fairly handle the distribution of limited infra > > > resources that may end up costing us money > > > > Is this really a topic for council? > > > > Isn't foundation an independent body and if someone requests funding > > from foundation and will get it approved... > > > > Or in other words: Can council veto against funding requests the > > foundation received and wants to approve? > > The way I see it is, if the council wants funding for something they > can request it from the foundation, but I don't think they can direct > the foundation not to fund something someone else requests. > > Also, given Antarus' response in the thread, I'm not sure there is > anything for council to discuss. > Does 'being not sure' authorize you to arbitrarily decide to skip agenda items from the community? -- Best regards, Michał Górny