From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IzDNb-0000p0-9X for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 15:38:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id lB3FcS44004881; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:38:28 GMT Received: from mta01.oricom.ca (mta01.oricom.ca [206.108.60.207]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id lB3FcRKx004872 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:38:28 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.101] (2.66.modemcable.oricom.ca [208.111.66.2]) by mta01.oricom.ca (Rockliffe SMTPRA 7.0.6) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:38:26 -0500 From: Olivier Fisette Organization: Gentoo Linux To: gentoo-pr@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-pr] Proposition - Gentoo 2007.1 Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:38:20 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200710281046.54941.ribosome@gentoo.org> <200711301112.06875.ribosome@gentoo.org> <1196473482.10243.10.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> In-Reply-To: <1196473482.10243.10.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-pr@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-pr@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3155821.V582QGHPqk"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200712031038.25362.ribosome@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 5d93f95b-1063-40b4-a1a9-17eb492af490 X-Archives-Hash: f3295e2c72cef72ff269adba6eea6ea7 --nextPart3155821.V582QGHPqk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 30 November 2007 at 08:44:42 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > ...not gonna happen. For one, we don't *ever* have our release done 3 > weeks before we ship it. We pretty much release it the second it's > completed. I did not say the release had to be ready three weeks prior to shipping it.= =20 Only that the articles would have to be written three weeks before the=20 release shipped, if we had an estimated release date. Anyway, it does not=20 matter. > There is no plan. There are no dates. Any dates we ever give out are > completely guesses and fairly arbitrary. > [...] > However, if that timeframe slips much more, we are likely dropping > the release entirely. > [...] > If we're starting over, we'd just wait a couple months and start on > 2008.0, instead.=20 Unless someone disagrees, I think the best course of action would be to inf= orm=20 Sonny that we would rather wait immediately after the next release (whether= =20 2007.1 or 2008.0) before commiting ourselves. I will also make sure to ask= =20 him how much we will be paid. (In the meanwhile, we can still plan and do a= =20 bit of research.) I will mail him tomorrow unless there are new elements of= =20 discussion by then. Cheers (and good luck for the release, Chris), Olivier =2D-=20 Olivier Fisette (ribosome) Gentoo Linux Developer Scientific applications --nextPart3155821.V582QGHPqk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHVCLtr/GGfYtwOqoRAmfVAKChA20OYmhUk7qGEuRhuSBvj4yiSACeLZ7t bmD/HLPYxJqZTPPuddriLgc= =4+p2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3155821.V582QGHPqk-- -- gentoo-pr@gentoo.org mailing list