From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18398 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 13:38:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 11 Jun 2004 13:38:02 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BYmEM-0004zF-DC for arch-gentoo-ppc-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:38:02 +0000 Received: (qmail 5140 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jun 2004 13:37:57 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-ppc-user-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 14118 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2004 13:37:57 +0000 Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 16:37:56 +0300 (EEST) From: IsoH To: gentoo-ppc-user@lists.gentoo.org, gentoo-ppc-dev@lists.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [gentoo-ppc-user] Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] G5 & missing performance X-Archives-Salt: a6c74573-66a8-4c98-b8e3-2cc684e749f6 X-Archives-Hash: f34fe54d9867eb56b72fa3f7a56e3ad7 On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, IsoH wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, IsoH wrote: > > > On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Pieter Van den Abeele wrote: > > > > > is /proc/cpufreq useable on a G5? > > > > Perhaps not... > > Solved, I think... > > I set following OF-values: > > boot-command mac-boot > boot-device sd0:2,yaboot > > then I cold-booted machine and voila previous bzipping time > was back, magical stunt?! > > I still suspect that boot-command value differs anything; > perhaps if boot is done from OF console with command > "boot"/"mac-boot" then machine is set to lower speed. > On the other hand, if boot is done by cold-booting and not > interfering boot sequence in any way then machine's processing > speed should be ok I think. Have to check that... > Yes, so it seems to be that it doesn't matter if "boot-command" is "boot" or "mac-boot" bzipping-test's speed is same in both ways... > > > -- IsoH -- gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org mailing list