* [gentoo-ppc-dev] app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc
@ 2003-09-03 1:03 David Holm
2003-09-03 1:23 ` Kevyn Shortell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Holm @ 2003-09-03 1:03 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-ppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 256 bytes --]
Hi,
app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc but is not in ~ppc.
It actually uses the same CPU core as UAE in order to make it portable.
How do we handle these things? Should I just add it to ~ppc and commit? Should I create a
bugzilla entry?
//David Holm
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc
2003-09-03 1:03 [gentoo-ppc-dev] app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc David Holm
@ 2003-09-03 1:23 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-09-03 1:36 ` David Holm
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevyn Shortell @ 2003-09-03 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: David Holm; +Cc: gentoo-ppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 663 bytes --]
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 18:03, David Holm wrote:
> Hi,
> app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc but is not in ~ppc.
> It actually uses the same CPU core as UAE in order to make it portable.
>
> How do we handle these things? Should I just add it to ~ppc and commit? Should I create a
> bugzilla entry?
>
> //David Holm
David,
Yes all you need to do is ~ppc it and commit it. It would be also a good
idea to send out an email to the ppc list letting people know, but you
dont really HAVE to do that, but we should come up with some kind of
policy for announcing things we've tagged. =)
(unless we already have one, and I'm spacing)
trance
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-ppc-dev] app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc
2003-09-03 1:23 ` Kevyn Shortell
@ 2003-09-03 1:36 ` David Holm
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Holm @ 2003-09-03 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-ppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 938 bytes --]
Would I be responsible for getting it into ppc in a month?
The irony of the situation is that I submitted the original ebuild for this before I was a
developer ;).
//David Holm
On 02 Sep 2003 18:23:03 -0700
Kevyn Shortell <trance@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 18:03, David Holm wrote:
> > Hi,
> > app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc but is not in ~ppc.
> > It actually uses the same CPU core as UAE in order to make it portable.
> >
> > How do we handle these things? Should I just add it to ~ppc and commit? Should I create a
> > bugzilla entry?
> >
> > //David Holm
>
> David,
>
> Yes all you need to do is ~ppc it and commit it. It would be also a good
> idea to send out an email to the ppc list letting people know, but you
> dont really HAVE to do that, but we should come up with some kind of
> policy for announcing things we've tagged. =)
>
> (unless we already have one, and I'm spacing)
>
> trance
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-03 1:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-03 1:03 [gentoo-ppc-dev] app-emulation/hatari-0.40 works on ppc David Holm
2003-09-03 1:23 ` Kevyn Shortell
2003-09-03 1:36 ` David Holm
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox