From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13338 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 07:50:39 +0000 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (156.56.111.197) by lists.gentoo.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 29 Jun 2004 07:50:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([156.56.111.196] helo=parrot.gentoo.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BfDO0-00032c-6A for arch-gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 07:50:36 +0000 Received: (qmail 16817 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jun 2004 07:50:35 +0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-portage-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail Reply-To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 8474 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2004 07:50:34 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: "Adrian Gschwend" Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:52:03 +0200 (CEST) Organization: netlabs.org Message-ID: References: <20040628160820.17a07020@sven.genone.homeip.net> Reply-To: "Adrian Gschwend" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ddhcp-219-109.hta-bi.bfh.ch X-Newsreader: PMINews 2.00.1205 For OS/2 Sender: news Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: portage-ng roadmap? X-Archives-Salt: 10522bff-84cd-443f-a97d-f659edfbd458 X-Archives-Hash: 498267300bae2ac64f2d8ea22c676aeb On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 16:08:20 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: >It's not getting along at all, we're concentrating our efforts on the >current portage. Right now I consider portage-ng a dead project. ok I propose that the one who can update the pages should do that :-) Now maybe I should write why I asked for it: I would like to use portage on another platform. I am admin of an open source project for OS/2 (no, not dead yet) and we have our unix layer as well. So far some guys did their own way or portage, unfortunately not a very flexible one. At work I use Gentoo nowadays and portage is a great tool so I thought migrating our ports to portage would be nice. What about the limitations in portage that are listed on the portage-ng page? Do you think it should be possible to get it to work on other platforms than Linux within a reasonable time? Where could I run into problems? Are there still people working on portage for Fink or BSD? cu Adrian -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list