From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RALR8-0004Bz-PS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 12:46:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 732A821C0D4; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A624921C0B7 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from grubbs.orbis-terrarum.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E6F1B4006 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22736 invoked by uid 10000); 2 Oct 2011 12:46:06 -0000 Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 12:46:06 +0000 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [GLEP59v2 5/5] GLEP59: Change live Manifest2 hashes to SHA256, SHA512, WHIRLPOOL Message-ID: References: <1317454855-2794-1-git-send-email-robbat2@gentoo.org> <1317454855-2794-6-git-send-email-robbat2@gentoo.org> <4E87EB2D.6070809@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E87EB2D.6070809@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 06c28b3246bfa69193eb5f950a457713 On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 09:40:13PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > If we control these hashes via metadata/layout.conf, then we can toggle > it atomically for all commiters. Otherwise, we'll have an annoying > period of time where different committers are committing different sets > of hashes, depending on their portage version. How do you suggest doing it via layout.conf? I've kept SHA256 in both sets for now, but if you could enforce new signatures including both WHIRLPOOL and SHA256, that would be great. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85