From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MJYTs-0006Bp-PJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:50:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EEB4E040B; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D87E040B for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C8C64138 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:50:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.969 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.969 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.630, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vfBeCC0yKsl for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD34C66454 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MJYTc-0004ZQ-6j for gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:48 +0000 Received: from ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.21.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:48 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:48 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: euse creates broken /etc/make.conf when USE declaration starts with empty line: Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4A4228EF.6000006@oversi.com> <20090624102731.677409f3@fenrir> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 22b0a9e3-45cf-48bf-a7f4-8322398998d4 X-Archives-Hash: f03120a8a50a26af315241aafd07fb53 Joseph Booker posted 20090624102731.677409f3@fenrir, excerpted below, on Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:27:31 -0500: > btw, gentoo-portage-dev really isn't the place to discuss euse bugs, > gentoo-dev, gentoo-user, the forums, or bugs.gentoo.org would be more > appropriate. (gentoo-portage-dev is more about the internals of portage= ) FWIW, gentoo-dev wouldn't be either. But as here, pretty much all lists=20 (and forums and IRC and...) should be at least polite enough to refer=20 first time posters to the correct locations, and often to answer the=20 question too. =3D:^) But Gentoo uses bugs for all sorts of stuff, including administrative=20 stuff like tracking new and retiring devs, and other "not ordinarily=20 something you'd call a bug" bugs, so that's a reasonable place (even if=20 they do get marked invalid or notabug at times), and the various user=20 forums/lists/IRC-channels work well if you want a second user opinion, or= =20 just some peer help, before bothering a dev. --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman