From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LuiYt-0003Vk-ED for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9C75E09E0; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C61E09E0 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB8A644FA for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.839 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.839 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.760, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSbEZvHGRUYN for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E75064468 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LuiYh-0005k2-0I for gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:23 +0000 Received: from ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.231.21.207]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:22 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:22 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Recommendation about faster (not smaller) filesystem and blocksize combination for portage tree Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:32:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <1238412618.18113.15.camel@localhost> <1239914420.18698.0.camel@localhost> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-231-21-207.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 15d1fdbf-ad3c-4d25-a2af-0ba23ef316e5 X-Archives-Hash: 9d43ce0d83a2b8bf90b947cc7796ef33 Pacho Ramos posted 1239914420.18698.0.camel@localhost, excerpted below, on Thu, 16 Apr 2009 22:40:20 +0200: > Thanks, finally seems that, in my case, reiserfs with nolog,noatime > works really fast and with a smaller size (thanks to "tail") :-D =3D:^) --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman