From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LiXOS-0006te-05 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D48DAE01C7; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89175E01C7 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908EC647FB for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.981 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.981 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.618, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YLMGWhgrDxAh for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1332F64715 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LiXOE-00071z-QJ for gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:15 +0000 Received: from ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net ([68.230.99.190]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:14 +0000 Received: from 1i5t5.duncan by ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:14 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: %n in writable segment detected ?? Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-230-99-190.ph.ph.cox.net User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies) Sender: news Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 7cd25ac7-4097-498a-9548-f0430fb48c6e X-Archives-Hash: 08cd303b6d0e1c86f0f7dd601ff2a24e Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> posted pan.2009.03.14.16.53.52@cox.net, excerpted below, on Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:53:52 +0000: > What's the below "%n in writable segment detected" bit all about? Here's some more strange output, from the last line above but here shown=20 as it was when portage finished. These sort of make sense, but AFAIK=20 should be in the individual emerge logs and spit out at the end with=20 them, not jumbled into the parallel jobs stuff. That's enough to file a=20 bug on, but I don't know whether it's the same one as above or unrelated,= =20 so thought I'd throw it in here first and ask since I have the thread=20 open already. >>> Jobs: 2 of 5 complete, 1 running Load avg: 4.81, 3.95,= =20 2.11*** %n in writable segment detected *** >>> Installing sys-fs/udev-140 >>> Installing sys-apps/coreutils-7.1 >>> Emerging (5 of 5) sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 >>> Jobs: 4 of 5 complete, 1 running Load avg: 1.98, 4.24,= =20 3.34QA: Static ELF: /tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/ build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2: /tmp/ portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux- gnu-nptl/elf/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 --library-path /tmp/portage/sys-libs/ glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl:/tmp/ portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux- gnu-nptl/math:/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build- amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf:/tmp/portage/sys-libs/ glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/dlfcn:/ tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc- linux-gnu-nptl/nss:/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/ build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/nis:/tmp/portage/sys-libs/ glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/rt:/tmp/ portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux- gnu-nptl/resolv:/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build- amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/crypt:/tmp/portage/sys-libs/ glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/nptl / tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc- linux-gnu-nptl/posix/getconf _POSIX_V6_WIDTH_RESTRICTED_ENVS >>> Jobs: 4 of 5 complete, 1 running Load avg: 1.87, 3.90,= =20 3.26QA: Static ELF: /tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/ build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/ldconfig: /tmp/portage/sys-libs/ glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/work/build-amd64-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-nptl/elf/ ldconfig -r /tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/image/ /lib64 / usr/lib64 >>> Installing sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 >>> Jobs: 5 of 5 complete Load avg: 1.52, 3.62,= =20 3.19 --=20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman