From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe?
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 11:54:33 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <pan$9e06c$7a692942$4bfe2d1a$aea214bc@cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 51AB2921.2060906@gmail.com
vivo75@gmail.com posted on Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:14:41 +0200 as excerpted:
> While portage can be safe, for various reason (including the resultant
> pkg) I do prefer to do the move in post_src_install() #1 All my tests
> have been done against a manually converted filesystem
That's what mine would be...
> #1 excerpt from bashrc, this code is rough but work in the gentoo
> ebuilds tree domain
>
> move_root_to_usr() {
Thanks. What I was thinking would actually reverse that (/bin being the
real dir, /sbin being a symlink to it), given my (traditional sysadmin)
pref for short paths, but I hadn't thought of a bashrc solution at all,
so that gives me yet another way of doing it. =:^)
My first thought is that I prefer standard layout packages, however,
easing interoperability should I decide to swap binpkgs with someone.
(Yes, I'm aware of the security issues if the parties don't trust each
other...)
But OTOH I think that solves issues such as path-based equery belongs,
for instance. Being amd64 for nearing a decade now (and no-multilib for
several years of it), I'm used to worrying about that with the symlinked
lib/lib64 thing, and that's the one thing I wasn't looking forward to
with unified bins. (I think I'll keep bin/sbin separate at first, see
how bin/usr-bin go first, then think about bin/sbin.)
But if your bashrc solution /does/ solve the equery belongs path thing I
might well use it on lib/lib64 as well... (Either that or since I
believe the libs are a profile thing and I'm already running a heavily
modified profile, no @system for instance, I could probably simply modify
that... Actually, that's probably a better solution in any case, since
it's just undoing mainline settings the same way mainline does them in
the first place.)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-02 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-01 5:36 [gentoo-portage-dev] Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe? Duncan
2013-06-01 5:49 ` Zac Medico
2017-12-07 8:37 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Duncan
2017-12-07 9:07 ` Zac Medico
2017-12-07 12:14 ` Duncan
2013-06-01 6:17 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2013-06-02 11:14 ` vivo75
2013-06-02 11:54 ` Duncan [this message]
2013-06-02 12:47 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " vivo75
2013-06-02 13:19 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='pan$9e06c$7a692942$4bfe2d1a$aea214bc@cox.net' \
--to=1i5t5.duncan@cox.net \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox