From: tvali <qtvali@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:02:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cea53e3c0603140302g4df4c72cp@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1075 bytes --]
I think that it would make things more clear and simple if portage did
support the following (maybe some are already included, but not found by
me):
* Add package to "world" checking all dependencies, but not emerging
* Remove package from "world" without unmerging
* Save all important messages into file instead of beeping (i may be away
from home); optionally replay them at end of update
* When updating or installing new package, if something goes wrong, still
emerge other packages, which havent failed packages as dependencies -- in my
case, for example, when i do --update, for example, then the fact that
update of first package fails does not definitely mean that i dont want to
update others
--
tvali
(e-mail: "qtvali@gmail.com"; msn: "qtvali@gmail.com";
icq: "317-492-912")
Ühe eesti internetifirma lehel kohtasin tsitaati:
If you don't do it excellently, dont do it at all. Because if it's not
excellent, it won't be profitable or fun, and if you're not in business for
fun or profit, what the hell are you doing here?
Robert Townsend
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1264 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2006-03-14 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-14 11:02 tvali [this message]
2006-03-14 11:10 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better Simon Stelling
2006-03-14 11:24 ` tvali
2006-03-14 11:53 ` tvali
2006-03-14 12:14 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:19 ` Devon Miller
2006-03-14 13:25 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:50 ` tvali
2006-03-14 14:33 ` tvali
2006-03-14 15:04 ` Brian
2006-03-14 15:32 ` tvali
2006-03-14 16:21 ` Brian
2006-03-15 0:33 ` esearch integration [was Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better] Brian Harring
2006-03-15 14:20 ` tvali
2006-03-15 14:21 ` tvali
2006-03-15 0:37 ` sync suggestions " Brian Harring
2006-03-15 14:18 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:21 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better tvali
2006-03-14 13:35 ` Marius Mauch
2006-03-14 14:52 ` tvali
2006-03-15 0:29 ` sql based cache [was Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better] Brian Harring
2006-03-14 14:44 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] Few things, which imho would make portage better Alec Warner
2006-03-14 15:03 ` tvali
2006-03-14 15:53 ` Johannes Fahrenkrug
2006-03-14 16:24 ` tvali
2006-03-14 13:50 ` Marius Mauch
2006-03-14 15:18 ` solar
2006-03-14 16:35 ` tvali
2006-03-14 18:26 ` tvali
2006-03-14 18:30 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-03-14 18:46 ` tvali
2006-03-14 18:49 ` Grant Goodyear
2006-03-14 14:50 ` felix
2006-03-14 13:44 ` Marius Mauch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cea53e3c0603140302g4df4c72cp@mail.gmail.com \
--to=qtvali@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox