From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZfk5-0006sJ-AK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:17:09 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFCDCE0193; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95998E0193 for ; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so3398911wff.10 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:17:07 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: antarus@scriptkitty.com Received: by 10.142.215.5 with SMTP id n5mr1801531wfg.201.1234937826992; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:17:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <489CC44C.3020309@gentoo.org> References: <489CC44C.3020309@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:17:06 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: f4ed50f6a28999fc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] missing-rebuild package set From: Alec Warner To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 90b24a9f-4442-40b2-b156-d6a8aa37fc32 X-Archives-Hash: 1a2238c943b5d5bfa80c83c7ed2fce6a On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Lucian Poston wrote: >> The following patchs add a library dependency rebuilder as a package >> set, @missing-rebuild, to portage-2.2_rc6. Similar to the --library >> flag in revdep-rebuild, the user can additionally emerge the set of >> packages containing consumers of libraries matched by a (python) >> regular expression; however, until a better solution is found, the >> regexp must be passed through the LIBRARY environment variable to >> enable that feature. >> >> Known issues: I expect some false positives. I've inserted hard coded >> directory/library masks for those I've found. I noticed a situation >> that required a second emerge due to a provider package satisfying 3 >> conditions: 1) the package is installed and an updated version is >> available in its slot, 2) the updated version is in the set due to a >> dependency of another package (or it may contains a broken binary), >> and 3) a consumer package of a library within the updated package is >> emerged before the updated dependency is emerged, causing a package to >> be compiled against the old library before the library version >> changes. I guess that if a package is already installed, it is not >> necessarily placed before its consumer packages in the merge order. >> >> Attached are patches for pym/portage/dbapi/vartree.py, >> pym/portage/sets/libs.py and /usr/share/portage/config/sets.conf. >> These can also be found in the project's repository: >> http://repo.or.cz/w/revdep-rebuild-reimplementation.git?a=tree;h=refs/heads/rc1;hb=refs/heads/rc1 > > Thanks, I've merged your LinkageMap changes. > > Side note: I suspect that we might be able to improve efficiency in > LinkageMap path comparisons by comparing tuples of device and inode > numbers instead of using realpath. We currently use the device/inode > number approach to test identity of paths in dblink.isowner(). As it is time for gSoC 2009; I want to inquire at the status of this code integration. Looking at HEAD it seems there are some changes left to merge. Is this on the roadmap? -Alec > >> I warmly welcome all feedback, in particular any suggestions to remove >> the necessity of directory and library masks in /etc/revdep-rebuild/*, >> which I've been unable to entirely avoid. >> >> Lucian >> > > I haven't merged the MissingLibraryConsumerSet yet since I'd like to > see if we can improve it a bit first. I don't have any ideas right > now but hopefully we can come up with something soon. > > Zac > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkicxEsACgkQ/ejvha5XGaNcyACfX7oKKCbYraRk8AwckkA9Reu6 > cRkAoMa/vK5SXDTdw8+nYqpBAlUXz096 > =zskl > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >