From: Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org>
To: Kerin Millar <kfm@plushkava.net>
Cc: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] AbstractEbuildProcess: disable ipc_daemon under Windows Subsystem for Linux
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 09:26:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMiTYSreo=kzOyRmFcdjZqP0Y+LAHrcF8Q-AxZ83-m6HzqTQ6Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160926235815.4d835f1c8c9da95e85f7a702@plushkava.net>
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Kerin Millar <kfm@plushkava.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:49:59 -0700
> Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:48 PM, Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Kerin Millar <kfm@plushkava.net> wrote:
>> >> Duly updated to use any instead of ==, as recommended by Brian Dolbec.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Kerin Millar <kfm@plushkava.net>
>> >
>> > My first choice would be to use a small test case to detect when ipc
>> > is broken, and disable it dynamically. A good example of such a test
>> > is the can_poll_device function here:
>> >
>> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/tree/pym/portage/util/_eventloop/EventLoop.py?h=portage-2.3.1#n597
>> >
>> > If it's not possible to use a test similar to the above, maybe it's
>> > best to use /proc/version or /proc/sys/kernel/osrelease as mentioned
>> > in the following issue:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/Microsoft/BashOnWindows/issues/423
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Zac
>>
>> I've started playing around with WSL, and I've discovered that
>> portage's ipc actually works if we use fcntl.flock instead of
>> fcntl.lockf!!! Simply set _default_lock_fn = fcntl.flock in
>> pym/portage/locks.py, and watch the tests succeed:
>>
>> $ pym/portage/tests/runTests.py pym/portage/tests/ebuild/test_ipc_daemon.py
>> testIpcDaemon (portage.tests.ebuild.test_ipc_daemon.IpcDaemonTestCase) ... ok
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ran 1 test in 1.282s
>>
>> OK
>
> How strange!
While the ebuild-ipc helper waits for a response, it uses non-blocking
lock calls to poll for liveliness, so it's critical that the locking
api be usable here. We've seen a similar issue in the past with PyPy,
where fcntl.lockf was broken while fcntl.flock worked just fine.
Thanks,
Zac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-27 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-26 5:49 [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] AbstractEbuildProcess: disable ipc_daemon under Windows Subsystem for Linux Zac Medico
2016-09-26 22:58 ` Kerin Millar
2016-09-27 16:26 ` Zac Medico [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-23 3:48 Zac Medico
2016-09-26 22:55 ` Kerin Millar
2016-09-23 3:23 Kerin Millar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMiTYSreo=kzOyRmFcdjZqP0Y+LAHrcF8Q-AxZ83-m6HzqTQ6Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=zmedico@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=kfm@plushkava.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox