From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19677138E66 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 397F9E0AF2; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f181.google.com (mail-vc0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90787E0AE6 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:04:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id lg15so2560345vcb.26 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:04:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=P/ICI67G5H4yc7CA1gcsuV1bSyey2HiWjV9CgNBhBHA=; b=ahA0ihJJPaUEQ7Cs5+0qvWBt+Prqy/oreHM9r+2lGSCFwcX4bn5wpbFO5wcJ9kUMOa zKmobltqFTkoMGw8zZ+/KSfU2epwuWbjmtE67a2SwQwo7YWwygr1pblTjHmFswtJ/L1b uP+bt/p5EkVgvT9zatSRaNCtGeB94+nZxSjr+z6uIxYbh8UIvY1HSurqWJ+cwmm1h7mg IFRSq9+qxSI6IJcK2KJ+S07T31ozec0E+dLJWCDmfcZN6VMM6S9SUBKvvezbSTqGkbKJ kkVgHzAKC7rsziW4e/dKWfgnJZjo1JUmplZW38P6jm25KxV2jV3iO8kxJl33wQ67cdpP H5vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=P/ICI67G5H4yc7CA1gcsuV1bSyey2HiWjV9CgNBhBHA=; b=dQ/9Bxu9Adw35negfxfWHixPKtq3P+O0YLP7wO2yj4oBm3We3Ld/kYIAr4noTJtUzV xvQUTuw7pr+XZAX/4jXvkWZT2Tumg4Bk0WBtuQ05+ng95Xm9HPqrBP55aVlnKYgU37Om ClIdXsch6tesG4Upp98V9dx7FQsKbahW9s6oVcV52DPX6ruZ1potlbkiJtOAX9AlrhhW /36Y4dQXlZ13cEgeesDuk5/JQBJuNSFpVsRkXACuPzUiY7Oyi2iEK6j5dMjaCjsbgow5 hIUKYrjUhiIKFCey19/f99FTCz7/mUOvCdzloGkZH+j4KpyHGLKfhOFrH+/VBpFUhThf kwOw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnFnRBXC54KH8AOkVBgYrv9E7EyaRlYRcrsva7b0tblLWrWpL1KNdqgsCtddsaddThkiGUGS5SFMCiMdtYtv57DsLvh7PXqjQeWMGYJkBTWEXEunjs1mkFmZIYVWU497P7Dq6tfq0xdJpVRJTOHSFbeKpsuQ9JzEy68NEy+/n+/PoMO6oekuule+1ezRBEGPwXFlHpmVRlBbDlpzQJ/f7x9vbjelw== X-Received: by 10.52.102.235 with SMTP id fr11mr11417502vdb.51.1393268653650; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:04:13 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.249.17 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:03:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20140224105659.37ffe539.dolsen@gentoo.org> References: <1393265666-8837-1-git-send-email-davidjames@google.com> <20140224105659.37ffe539.dolsen@gentoo.org> From: David James Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:03:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add a test case for --newuse, --changed-use, and --binpkg-respect-use. To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1135f3702d95da04f32ba3a0 X-Archives-Salt: 83933373-9dcc-4caa-b9fb-49f124552fb2 X-Archives-Hash: a78a0f9c1f49081cf4b857a0de99274e --001a1135f3702d95da04f32ba3a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:14:26 -0800 > David James wrote: > > > Change-Id: I201e468c6e7cda6aa961371ad9ddc10cfab04bc7 > > --- > > pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py | 78 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py > > > > > > Was there a difference in this posting to the one last Thursday? > > If not a simple bump reminder was all that should have been done. > > If it is different, they you should have created the patch with the > -v 2 format-patch option. And summarized the changes. > > Sebastian I believe, has had the most experience with the tests, so I > will leave the review up to him, Mike. It's the same patch -- I just accidentally sent it twice. So consider this a bump, then. --001a1135f3702d95da04f32ba3a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On M= on, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@gentoo.org> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:14:26= -0800
David James <davidjames@google.= com> wrote:

> Change-Id: I201e468c6e7cda6aa961371ad9ddc10cfab04bc7
> ---
> =C2=A0pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py | 78 +++++++++++++++= ++++++++++++++
> =C2=A01 file changed, 78 insertions(+)
> =C2=A0create mode 100644 pym/portage/tests/resolver/test_useflags.py >
>

Was there a difference in this posting to the one last Thursday?

If not a simple bump reminder was all that should have been done.

If it is different, they you should have created the patch with the
-v 2 =C2=A0format-patch option. =C2=A0And summarized the changes.

Sebastian I believe, has had the most experience with the tests, so I
will leave the review up to him, Mike.

It&#= 39;s the same patch -- I just accidentally sent it twice. So consider this = a bump, then.

--001a1135f3702d95da04f32ba3a0--