From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB70138CBD for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A76E4E08DF; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-f179.google.com (mail-qc0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AACEE089E for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 02:24:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcvs11 with SMTP id s11so15328063qcv.7 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=k+nHpn0KG56tOuvWFE2Nqiyoi3YXzJGn+qaVyUSA4zo=; b=g0AdrbPegVYPslIss6FwQWto1bP704SJutJ949qIkIq93G4e+yB4rQR3ml+oQ7rngb bZ8XIf7hhtLVD5MruvWmrKnbEoLWFzwA4R3oZJMha5m/GPRatmjKGnBNLsSzdC7Z/St/ qhddZmcjVqbQyNt6k9Yi4RHJszw/7HXIrsuTeRaRBh4YwSYuQgUN/P9wjy2lGXlaeI8V +sPMpzEfMwoZvj9X70N5Ly4WixyMjR3RLs+dmHTesGQ1eKS4rgpKT9lXq4ExPGwUqTHY sADbQE9oDWLc7BPloH0+fVgYqUIDnbmbuI6JF/o3CyftkxFjngDbVYMbIbeGz3CQTW99 eQdQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.144.147 with SMTP id 141mr51789459qhq.91.1426127039532; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.51.104 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 15:23:59 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] RFC: emerge manpage options categorization From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1137674c98936405110e13b1 X-Archives-Salt: 7dbd4da6-ff7c-4d4b-a9c4-26970d90e416 X-Archives-Hash: acbc57854803ad05fe3b03ddc8ed0b80 --001a1137674c98936405110e13b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 12 March 2015 at 15:19, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Comments? A less radical change would be some sort of tagging notation on each feature to indicate their usage. That way, it doesn't impede the current audience who expects to be able to browse the list alphabetically. ( I suggest this, because restructuring it radically will have potential bikeshed drama of people not liking the new layout, so tag-style metadata makes the levels visible without requiring a restructure ) -- Kent *KENTNL* - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL --001a1137674c98936405110e13b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On 12 March 2015 at 15:19, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> = wrote:
Comments?

A less radical change would be some sort of = tagging notation on each feature to indicate their usage.

That = way, it doesn't impede the current audience who expects to be able to b= rowse the list alphabetically.

( I = suggest this, because restructuring it radically will have potential bikesh= ed drama of people not liking the new layout, so tag-style metadata makes t= he levels visible without requiring a restructure )

--
Kent


--001a1137674c98936405110e13b1--