* [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: EAPI 6
@ 2020-03-14 21:30 99% ` Zac Medico
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Zac Medico @ 2020-03-14 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-portage-dev, Samuel Bernardo
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 943 bytes --]
On 3/14/20 1:40 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote:
> Thank you very much Zac for your answers.
>
> I was wondering if I was missing any coding convention after reading
> [1], since I always follow the pattern to define eclasses inside my
> overlays as needed, sometimes overriding those provided from gentoo
> portage. I was not sure if I was doing the development breaking the
> expected QA rules.
>
> With your explanation I know now that I'm doing it the right way.
>
> [1]
> https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#qa-notice----eclass-foo-inherited-illegally
The stale cache issues that are mentioned there only applied to the
'pms' cache format which should not be used since around 2012/2013 when
we changed the default for the metadata/layout.conf cache-formats
setting here:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e760c8d2a4ccc56e351ac37904c715f596b58e42
--
Thanks,
Zac
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 981 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [relevance 99%]
Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2020-03-12 10:42 [gentoo-portage-dev] EAPI 6 Samuel Bernardo
2020-03-14 14:20 ` [gentoo-portage-dev] " Samuel Bernardo
2020-03-14 18:48 ` Zac Medico
2020-03-14 20:40 ` Samuel Bernardo
2020-03-14 21:30 99% ` Zac Medico
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox