public inbox for gentoo-portage-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Search results ordered by [date|relevance]  view[summary|nested|Atom feed]
thread overview below | download: 
* Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge(1): document --oneshot caveats (bug 563482)
  @ 2015-10-21  5:11 99%     ` Zac Medico
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ results
From: Zac Medico @ 2015-10-21  5:11 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-portage-dev

On 10/20/2015 05:37 PM, Rob Wortman wrote:
> On 2015-10-20 at 21:44:58 +0200, bernalex@gentoo.org wrote:
>> (since it's describing somewhat complicated functionality)
> 
> So, I'm curious what's actually going on there. If I emerge packages
> with --oneshot, does that create the possibility of broken dependencies
> for world-reachable packages, or does updating @world create the
> possiblity of broken dependencies for oneshot'ed packages?
> 

Any packages that are not reachable from @world are ripe for removal by
--depclean, so we allow their dependencies to break in order to satisfy
other dependencies (like in bug 563482). If you don't use --deep, then
emerge may try to build something that depends on one of these
unreachable packages with broken dependencies, such that whatever you
are trying to build has broken indirect dependencies (which is likely to
trigger a build failure like in bug 563482).
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


^ permalink raw reply	[relevance 99%]

Results 1-1 of 1 | reverse | options above
-- pct% links below jump to the message on this page, permalinks otherwise --
2015-10-20 19:29     [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge(1): document --oneshot caveats (bug 563482) Zac Medico
2015-10-20 19:44     ` Alexander Berntsen
2015-10-21  0:37       ` Rob Wortman
2015-10-21  5:11 99%     ` Zac Medico

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox